fixed 3.2 style

This commit is contained in:
Francesco Rinaldi 2017-01-22 22:42:12 +01:00
parent 1ebbecca39
commit 069f275869

View File

@ -4382,25 +4382,23 @@ Scale Factor Values for COCOMO R II Models
\end_layout \end_layout
\begin_layout Paragraph \begin_layout Paragraph
PREC Precedentedness
\end_layout \end_layout
\begin_layout Standard \begin_layout Description
Precedentedness. PREC This driver reflects the previous experience that developers have in
This driver reflects the previous experience that developers have in the the development of large scale projects.
development of large scale projects.
Actually, this is our first experience, so we think the best value for Actually, this is our first experience, so we think the best value for
our team is Low. our team is Low.
\end_layout \end_layout
\begin_layout Paragraph \begin_layout Paragraph
FLEX Development flexibility
\end_layout \end_layout
\begin_layout Standard \begin_layout Description
Development flexibility. FLEX This driver reflects the degree of flexibility in the development process
This driver reflects the degree of flexibility in the development process
with respect to the external specication and requirements. with respect to the external specication and requirements.
Since on side there are very strict requirements on the functionalities Since on side there are very strict requirements on the functionalities
but on the other no specific technology was specified to be used, this but on the other no specific technology was specified to be used, this
@ -4408,12 +4406,11 @@ Development flexibility.
\end_layout \end_layout
\begin_layout Paragraph \begin_layout Paragraph
RESL Risk resolution
\end_layout \end_layout
\begin_layout Standard \begin_layout Description
Risk resolution. RESL It reflects the extension of risk analysis.
It reflects the extension of risk analysis.
A Very Low value means we have done a poor analysis, Very High means a A Very Low value means we have done a poor analysis, Very High means a
complete risk analysis. complete risk analysis.
We choose Very High because we did a detailed analysis (Chapter 6). We choose Very High because we did a detailed analysis (Chapter 6).
@ -4421,22 +4418,25 @@ Risk resolution.
\end_layout \end_layout
\begin_layout Paragraph \begin_layout Paragraph
TEAM 5 Team cohesion
\end_layout \end_layout
\begin_layout Standard \begin_layout Description
Team cohesion. TEAM
This value is an indicator of how well the development team know each other. \begin_inset space ~
\end_inset
5 This value is an indicator of how well the development team know each
other.
In this case we are a very cooperative team, so we choose a Very High value. In this case we are a very cooperative team, so we choose a Very High value.
\end_layout \end_layout
\begin_layout Paragraph \begin_layout Paragraph
PMAT Process maturity
\end_layout \end_layout
\begin_layout Standard \begin_layout Description
Process maturity. PMAT This parameter reflects the process maturity of the organizazion.
This parameter reflects the process maturity of the organizazion.
In particular, this parameter has been choosen according to a weighted In particular, this parameter has been choosen according to a weighted
average of “Yes” answers to CMM Maturity Questionnaire. average of “Yes” answers to CMM Maturity Questionnaire.
In our case we have chosen High (CMM Level 3). In our case we have chosen High (CMM Level 3).